Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Small Portable Mirrors

WELCOME TO OUR

This blog has been created for owners and residents in general may be aware of all happenings, events and status of the processes occurring in our package. Complento hope will be of interest and is the tool so you can know:

" THAT WALK" ..

WELCOME

Monday, March 15, 2010

Quotes About Confidenciality

abortion, a woman's right? Amnesty International responds.

This afternoon, the third and final week of the course on Human Rights Institute DD.HH. Catalonia (IHRC), we enjoyed a "face to face" between Edward Martin, Deputy Clerk of the Human Rights Office, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Cooperation and Iziar Ruiz-Gimenez-president of the English section of Amnesty International. The debate has focused on human rights in Spain, from the universal periodic review.
Taking the opportunity I made a question to the President of Amnesty International in Spain Malgrat that m'imaginava the resposta ja.

The question has estat:
"There has been much talk about the right to life, specifically on torture. My question is about this right but in another area. It's for you, Iziar." Currently, Amnesty International defends abortion as a right of women-as-government does, or defending the human right to life of those not yet born, for without this right other would be meaningless. Thank you. " I

the resposta has estat, aproximadament:
"Amnesty International is based on international standards of sexual and reproductive rights of women. No woman should die the practice of abortion underground. Many women Muera every day in many places in the world by these abortos clandestinos, Fruto violations.

Conclusion: According
President, Amnesty International has no opinion or opinion on this, just based on what called internationally. And the current international trend, as mentioned, is that abortion is a sexual and reproductive rights of women. Therefore, AI considers abortion as a woman's right?
In 2007 , AI made the following statements:
"Amnesty International's policy on sexual rights and the reproductivos not promueve abortion as a universal right, and the organization keeps silence about the goodness or maldad of abortion. "
This confirms the lack of criteria. But nevertheless, in recent years, there is a movement within AI to become partnership a pro-abortion platform.

currently the official position is: "AI does not have a position on whether or not the women have a right to pregnancy is not interrupted Deseado, there is no right to an abortion generalmente Accepted in International Law of human rights ". However, at the regional level, eg Number of Canada, among others, have broken the silence of AI declaring that" women have the right to an abortion legal, safe and accessible if you choose from aborting.

The silence is broken. How can a partnership, this great partnership, which criticizes and denounces violations of Drrets Human persecussions and not take any clear criterion toward the right life as regards the issue of abortion? Yes, I know, you can discern what is the position of AI But this ambiguity, this non-statement, creates great confusion. Hopefully someday declare any opinion on the subject. But then that day will go against the human right to me fundamental right to life. And then you have just lost all legitimacy.
hope Peter Benenson, founder d'AI, des intercedeixi the firmament.


LSR

Friday, March 12, 2010

Good Names For A Good Vampire

letter of a former socialist

A / A Secretary-General of the PSOE, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero

A / Organizing Secretary of the PSOE, Leire Pajin Iraola

Following approval this afternoon of the future law abortion, Aido law in the full Senate with a slim majority of wills purchased concessions blow this game, the English Socialist Workers Party, a step forward in the conquest of unreason in which both road is traveled. This law has been possible thanks to the previous problems that had already been taken:

one hand, the lack of freedom within the party is a characteristic and unmistakable sign to perceive how far they have betrayed the democratic values \u200b\u200bthat have always characterized the Left. Not only did we go to the previous general election in 2008 without bringing in the electoral program any reference to the law now passed, but months later, in the keynote speech of the Federal Congress XXXVI no specific reference was made to promote a new law of abortion where this is considered as a right. We fooled

the electorate they represent, and we ignored the internal dialogue within the party on an issue that not only is contrary to universal humanism that historically characterized the socialism, but also divides society dramatically. This fact is very serious anti-democratic.

In addition, we have looked stunned as has been agreed with the most reactionary nationalist abortion is a right without limits, keeping the course strainer to the 22 th week. I learned from old and true socialist militants, which led to the last breath of their lives for the ideals they believed, "There is today a statement more reactionary than the right of a person over the life of the unborn child. Is the absolute property right conceivable, beyond the right of the master over the slave. " Ownership of the people and was abolished in the history of mankind.

is clear that socialism, in this game, no longer able to overcome 40 years of leave during the Franco dictatorship, has not been able to connect to the socialist spirit of the working class poor who created it, so I ask that from this day stating my low as member of PSOE. Also available to the party get elected to occupy in the City of Stops (Sevilla). Never let that my name appears next to an organization that legitimizes the killing of innocents by the adoption of unjust laws.



Joaquin Navarro Manuel Montero
2n. Stops Tinent d'Mayor (Sevilla)
February 24, 2010

How To Buy Things Through Proxy

¿De Rien that?

"I'm looking at a picture that has appeared in most newspapers on 25 February. They are a group of smiling women, among which are the ministers Aido and Racer, Leyre Pajín, a socialist senator in the midst of all the Minister of Justice, Caamaño. The plasma picture a happy faces with big smiles and if it was not because I was taking it when they think they've won the lottery or that all these women are doing a party to the minister, but it's not, no, the photo corresponds to the time of vetoes rejected the Abortion Act and would be finally approved in the Senate.
With this law that just passed allowing women to abort freely, even while having only 16 years, as long as they do in the first fourteen weeks of life of the child within themselves. This is a law that seeks to impose abortion on society English as a right of women and, in contrast, shows no interest in protecting unborn life.

As a society is not a day to smile, but at least to ponder. What happened that in the XXI century we can think of no other solution to an unintended pregnancy to end the life of the innocent?, What has happened to it after so many resources spent on campaigns of "sex education" to continue increasing the number of abortions each year?, what has happened to you to believe that parents are a problem for their teenage daughters?, what have we done wrong to think that power is an abortion in a country is a sign of progress and social advancement?

I have to say that after attending the last debate on abortion law felt shame and embarrassment, because abortion is a failure is a failure of society, is an irreversible bad that it does not value life and solves a problem by the shortest route. There is a right, much less a social advancement, it is not progressive nor social nor caring, nor ethical, denied the first right of man and with him everyone else. Not release the woman does not respect the man. In an advanced society like ours, with so many media of all kinds, it is sad to think that this is all we can think to do when things do not come as planned. Let me

So you do not share your joy that apostamos insulting for those who fear life and for rights of those people, so very very tiny that Sean. "


Senator Maria Caballero
UPN
letter published in the Diario de Navarra 28.02